BETA
This is a BETA experience. You may opt-out by clicking here

More From Forbes

Edit Story

Lifesaving Lessons from the Makers of Sprite?

Following
This article is more than 10 years old.

(Photo credit: Public Domain Photos)

It was the late 90s and HIV was spreading through South African teenagers like, well, like a sexually transmitted disease. Sleep with a South African at that time and you faced a one in six chance of having a close encounter with the virus. Frightening odds. But not frightening enough to curb teenage sexual activities.

Desperate to turn the tide, public health leaders came up with a new anti-HIV campaign: NASHI, for the National Adolescent Sexual Health Initiative. Personally, I think they should have called it ESTINA for Every South African Teenager is Now Asleep. Because that campaign, like so many public health campaigns, was doomed to fail. It was all information, and no persuasion. All lecture, no fun.

Fortunately, Judi Nwokedi had a different idea. A psychologist who had recently moved back to South Africa, she had recently decided to run a campaign modeled on the successful relaunch of Sprite into the South African market. As described in Tina Rosenberg’s excellent book Join the Club, Nwokedi noticed that Sprite was less focused on informing consumers about the characteristics of its product – fresh taste! Lemon lime accents! – than on creating a sense of community, where Sprite’s brand would be associated with fun and cool activities. As Rosenberg quotes Nwokedi:

“They did basketball, fun activities. They sponsored concerts, sent cool kids onto campus .”

So she created the LoveLife Program. They posted billboards with slogans like “Get Attitude!” They published magazines on websites that focused as much, maybe more, on fashion than on HIV. Parents thought this campaign was awful. It wasted too much time on non-educational activities, in their humble opinions. But kids thought otherwise. This LoveLife thing looked like a group they wanted to be part of!

Too often, in trying to help people make better decisions in life, we health experts focus on information – on facts and figures. But information is just the starting point. People are rarely motivated by facts and figures alone, a topic I discuss in some detail in my recent book Critical Decisions. What person doesn’t know that a double whopper is bad for his waistline? What smoker doesn’t know that a pack a day of Marlboro’s is bad for his lungs, heart, and [insert your favorite internal organ here]?

For facts to motivate, they need to feel relevant and immediate.. And what motivates kids more than peer pressure?

LoveLife succeeded in part by putting most of the “messaging” into the hands of teenage peers, and by not worrying about how frequently or vehemently pushed the message. One teenager summarized the program succinctly:

Seeing billboards of a dying person didn’t tell me about me. But when someone says “You have such amazing potential that HIV shouldn’t be part of it” – then it wasn’t about HIV. It was about me.

As someone trained in both medicine and behavioral economics, I’ve thought a lot about how to best “nudge” people towards healthier behaviors, without restricting their freedom to choose for themselves. The success of LoveLife serves to remind me that efforts to help people improve their health and well-being should not focus solely on providing folks with the facts. They all need to feel that the facts “are about me”!