Sexual preference. Relationship status. Income. Address. These are just some details applicants for the controversial dating site BeautifulPeople.com are asked to supply before their physical appeal is judged by the existing user base, who vote on who is allowed in to the "elite" club based on looks alone. All of this, of course, is supposed to remain confidential. But much of that supposedly-private information is now public, thanks to the leak of a database containing sensitive data of 1.1 million BeautifulPeople.com users. The leak, according to one researcher, also included 15 million private messages between users. Another said the data is now being sold by traders lurking in the murky corners of the web.
News of the breach was passed to FORBES initially in December 2015 by researcher Chris Vickery. At the time, BeautifulPeople.com said the compromised data came from a test server, which was quickly locked up. It did not appear to be a serious incident.
But the information - which now appears to be real user data despite being hosted on a non-production server - was taken by one or more less-than-scrupulous individuals before the lockdown, making it out into the dirty world of data trading this year. That's according to Troy Hunt, an Australian security expert who runs the website HaveIBeenPwned.com, where people can check if their own information has been leaked in some of the biggest breaches in recent memory, from Adobe to Ashley Madison. The data has been traded online, Hunt said, though he doesn't know where or for how much (such troves can fetch tens of thousands of dollars, though can cost as little as $300, as seen in a recent sale of 4 million Naughty America accounts). The contact who handed Hunt the data operated in "data trading circles", he said. They declined to be interviewed for this article.
Hunt verified the Beautiful People breach with users of his site and carried out further checks alongside those done by FORBES. For instance, it was possible to try to reset passwords using leaked login details; the site rejected attempts to do so when email addresses were not in use, making it possible to check if someone was signed up. A handful of nearly two dozen email addresses obtained by FORBES didn't appear to be linked to an account on the site, but most were.
Other leaked data included weight, height, job, education, body type, eye colour and hair hue, as well as email address and mobile phone number. Location data, in the form of latitude and longitude, were also leaked, along with smoking and drinking habits, interests and favourite TV shows, movies and books. Anyone using the site expecting privacy should now consider themselves exposed, right down to their appearance, whereabouts and interests.
"We’re looking at in excess of 100 individual data attributes per person," Hunt told FORBES. "Everything you’d expect from a site of this nature is in there."
Vickery said the database he'd obtained contained 15 million messages between users. One exchange shown to FORBES involved users asking for prurient pictures of one another. A separate message read: "I didn't even think to look for a better photo because the brits, on average, are some ugly motherf***ers anyway." This would appear to chime with BeautifulPeople.com's own "research".
Two BeautifulPeople.com users confirmed their information was in the leaked database, which also contained encrypted passwords. They shared their entries as found in the database, which showed an entry for descriptions of themselves, revealing more private details about their personal lives. One confirmed the latitude and longitude details were correct, pointing to Cambridge, UK, where they'd signed up.
BeautifulPeople.com, which brags about being "the largest network of attractive people in the world", has courted controversy in the past by removing thousands of users from the service for not being attractive enough. In 2009, it boasted 1.8 million "ugly people" had been denied access to the site. In 2010, 5,000 were culled after gaining too much weight over a festive break. Last year, weight gain and ageing led to another 3,000 being thrown out.
Today, the company re-sent its original statement on the breach, first received by FORBES in December. "We can confirm we were notified of a breach on December 24th of 2015 of one of our MongoDB test servers. This was a staging server and not part of our production data base. The staging server was immediately shut down." The company claimed all affected members were informed of "the vulnerability" in December, whilst noting passwords were encrypted and no financial data was exposed.
FORBES asked the two users if they had been warned about any security issue in December. They said they had not. BeautifulPeople.com had not responded to requests for further comment on the breach.
The information was stored in a MongoDB database, left open to anyone who knew the right web address. Many such databases have been left open in recent months, as found by Vickery. Last week, Vickery, currently a security researcher with MacKeeper, discovered a huge trove of 93.4 million Mexican voter records in an unsecured MongoDB database. He'd already uncovered 191 million US voter records in late 2015, as well as 13 million MacKeeper users' information kept in unprotected MongoDB stores.
BeautifulPeople.com is far from the only dating site to have suffered a breach in recent months. In February, a hacker claimed to have compromised Mate1, offering 27 million user passwords for 20 bitcoin (worth around $8,700 at the time). Ashley Madison, whose entire adulterous business was turned inside out and its 37 million users exposed, suffered the most ignominious dating site breach in mid-2015. In light of reported suicides linked to the event, it was, perhaps, the most harmful hack of all time.
Anyone concerned their information leaked in any of those dating site breaches can check on Hunt's website, HaveIBeenPwned.com.
UPDATE BeautifulPeople.com provided an updated statement: "The breach involves data that was provided by members prior to mid July 2015. No more recent user data or any data relating to users who joined from mid July 2015 onward is affected.
"All impacted members are, of course, being notified once again. The data does not contain any credit card information and user passwords are encrypted."
