BETA
This is a BETA experience. You may opt-out by clicking here

More From Forbes

Edit Story

Tech Lessons From The 'Dark Ages'

Following
This article is more than 9 years old.

The "Dark Ages" in what is now Western Europe sometimes conjure images of a very low-tech society --- replete with outright barbarism and boiling vats of gruel. But the early Middle Ages (or “Dark Ages”) — a longtime historical pejorative — were actually a time of great technological progress, medieval scholars now say.

A scarcity of written records has given rise to the misconception that the early Middle Ages --- roughly correlating with the end of the Roman Empire in the West (around 476 A.D.)  to about 1000 A.D. --- were unrelentingly primitive, says Benjamin Hudson, a professor of history and medieval studies at Penn State University.

Yet in many ways medievalists were centuries ahead of their time; intrinsically-linked to their landscape and intent on looking for alternative means to harness the power of nature. Part of the Dark Ages’ image problems, says Hudson, is tied to the nature of scientific development, which in the case of technology was incremental.

“The people making the discoveries often could not read or write,” said Hudson. “The literate class was the clergy, who had limited interest in science.”

The water-powered blast furnace is seen by some as the greatest technological development of the epoch; since it enabled iron to smelt at higher temperatures and much faster and more cheaply than any previous technology.

High-quality horse stirrups were a byproduct of such improved smelting techniques which; as Paolo Squatriti, a medieval historian at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, points out, enabled a mounted rider to whack his opponents over the head without falling out of the saddle. “This made the ‘knight in shining armor’ possible,” he said.

Although the Classical world that preceded the Dark Ages was aware of basic engineering techniques and energy sources, it depended on slave labor, says Hudson.

“Among the Roman [aristocracy] there was an overweening disdain for the mechanical arts, to such an extent that even reading was considered manual labor,” said Squatriti. “So, you sat back and listened while a slave read to you.”

The idea that manual work was “bad,” says Squatriti, spread with the result that an aristocratic Roman who had the time and resources to devote to the pursuit of technology would never have done such research because he considered it “way below his status.”

As Squatriti asks: Why invent a machine to do labor when you had all your defeated enemies to do it?

To be sure, one major driver for tech development in the Dark Ages was simply the dismantlement of the Roman Empire and the fact that there were no longer enormous amounts of slave labor. Starting in 200 A.D., says Squatriti, there’s also a massive decline in population; especially in the former Roman Western provinces.

The collapse of Roman imperial authority in Northern Europe was accompanied by a technological crisis, Hudson notes. For early Europe, he says these changed circumstances led to improved metal refining techniques in Scandinavia in the 9th century. And in the 10th century, he says development of the windmill allowed for a renewable energy source when water was frozen for months at a time in Northern Europe.

“Where we find centers of economic activity we see technological advances and vice versa,” said Anne McCants, an economic historian at MIT. “So, shipping technologies are the big story in 7th and 8th century North Sea centers inhabited by Vikings, Friesians and the like.”

Sometimes called the Dark Age Emporia, McCants says these regions were hubs of economic activity; connected to vast trading networks that stretched from the Black Sea into the far reaches of the North Atlantic.

“What made all of that trade possible was really significant improvements in boat construction and sailing technology,” said McCants, “advances that allowed for both greater cargo tonnages and fewer oarsmen or sailors per vessel.”

But even with such innovation, Squatriti says in the Dark Ages, costs went up just because there were fewer people and, thus, less cheap labor.

McCants notes that two things make labor expensive: either a very limited supply of labor or a very high standard of living.

“But cheap labor in a growing economy is likely to want more of the pie down the line,” said McCants. “This is what I see happening in China, and it is basically a good thing if that improves people’s quality of life.”

However, robotics may offer manufacturers, particularly in China, ways to opt out of sharing such proverbial “pies.” Presumably, says McCants, what motivates many factory owners to incorporate robots into their production lines is that robots don’t demand improvements in their standard of living.

It all gives pause to wonder if robots will become this post-modern era’s Roman equivalent of slaves? And exactly how the current era’s tech history will read a thousand years hence?

“In the last 600 years, [from the age of Columbus to today], most of the tech benefits went to a small minority,” said Squatriti. “But one of the nice things about the Dark Ages is that power was divided into very small bundles and this led to a more equal distribution of machines.”

And because necessity truly is the mother of invention, populations of the former Roman Empire’s Western provinces during this era, arguably had their backs against the wall in ways that young technologists and entrepreneurs today can hardly imagine.

Thus, the Dark Ages’ biggest tech take-away may be to simply pose questions based on technological necessity, rather than merely the whims of the thundering herd.

Follow me on Facebook, Twitter and Google +.