BETA
This is a BETA experience. You may opt-out by clicking here

More From Forbes

Edit Story

IRS vs. Scientology: Here We Go Again

Following
This article is more than 10 years old.

I recently wrote about forming a church as tax planning.  I wasn’t entirely serious but I wasn’t completely joking either.  Fact is, there's more there to this topic than you might think.  After all, there are many tax advantages of church status.

You need a coveted IRS determination letter that you qualify. All the big religions have them and many not so big ones do too. In fact, even compared with the list of tax perks to which other tax-exempt organizations are entitled, church status is the crème de la crème. See Christian Crusade For Tax Benefits.

For that reason, churches and those who found or promote them sometimes face tax scrutiny. Take Madonna’s Kabbalah, a Jewish movement with roots in the Zohar, a holy book said to be 2,000 years old. Kabbalah claims 4,000 regular participants around the world.

Many criticize it for not requiring followers to leave other faiths.  Madonna or not, it’s a legitimate religion says the IRS. But the IRS is pursuing a criminal investigation into tax evasion at Los Angeles’ Kabbalah Centre. See IRS Stirs The Kabbalah Pot and The Kabbalah Centre in Los Angeles is the focus of an IRS investigation into tax evasion.

As a tax lawyer for 30 years, I’ve seen IRS scrutiny on churches wax and wane especially with Scientology. For years the IRS denied it was a church, but after multiple bouts of litigation and administrative harangues, the IRS abruptly ruled Scientology was a church in 1993. The New York Times claimed the IRS reversed 30 years of precedent to grant Scientology Section 501(c)(3) status when Scientology dropped numerous lawsuits against the IRS.

Some are claiming that the IRS should look at the Church of Scientology anew. How does the controversial religion stack up against church criteria? See IRS Should Review Scientology Tax-Exempt Status. Some claim to have seen coercive fundraising efforts, suggesting the IRS had the wool pulled over its eyes when it granted church status in 1993.

These critics say all is not what it appears to be.  See this St. Petersburg Times series. Still, calls for the IRS or Congress to look at religious organizations in general---or anyone in particular---tend to make people queasy. Perhaps that’s because of the fundamental separation between church and state. In any case, if the IRS does decide to take on Scientology for round two---which I doubt---I expect the bout to be noisy.

You can reach me at Wood@WoodLLP.com. This discussion is not intended as legal advice, and cannot be relied upon for any purpose without the services of a qualified professional.